Sfoglia categorie
Esplora
Fiverr Pro
Italiano
$
USD
Luz Portwood
@luz_writer1
Book Editing, Ghostwriting, Ebook writing, Developmental Edit and Proofreading
Stati Uniti
Inglese, Spagnolo, Francese
Chi sono
I’m Luz, a professional writer and editor with extensive experience across multiple genres and industries. Over the past nine years, I’ve worked on more than 300 novels, delivering high quality writing and editing Customized to each client’s vision. I take pride in producing polished, engaging work and treating every project as an opportunity to grow and refine my skills. If you’re seeking a dedicated, passionate professional to bring your ideas to life, I’d be delighted to collaborate with you.
Competenze
Luz Portwood
offline •
Tempo di risposta medio: 2 ore
Consulta i miei servizi
Beta reading
I will christian beta reader fantasy beta reader ya fiction beta reader book critique
Formattazione
I will do print book formatting, novel formatting, fiction formatting
3 Recensioni
| (1) | ||
| (0) | ||
| (1) | ||
| (1) | ||
| (0) |
Valutazione dettagliata
- Livello di comunicazione del venditore
- Qualità della consegna
- Valore della consegna
1-3 di 3 recensioni
Ordina per
Più rilevante
brandymarks07
Stati Uniti
Collaborazione in corso
Working with Luz on my novel, Blood of Starlight, was one of the best decisions I made during the editing process. Her beta reader report was exceptionally thorough and insightful. Rather than offering only general impressions, she carefully evaluated each chapter’s characters, relationships, worldbuilding,...
Risposta del venditore
Utile?
brandymarks07
Stati Uniti
Collaborazione in corso
Her beta read was excellent and provided helpful insight. Unfortunately, the copyediting and proofreading did not meet a professional standard. We had agreed on a total price of $500 for my approximately 85,000-word manuscript, and I understood that this price included both copyediting and proofreading....
Risposta del venditore
Utile?
brandymarks07
Stati Uniti
Collaborazione in corso
I thank the freelancer for the additional work she put into Parts 1 and 2. The revised approach was substantially better and much closer to what I originally expected. However, I still found missing spaces, unresolved grammar and wording problems, and visible editing artifacts. Therefore, I cannot consider...
Utile?
