I will fix, debug, and validate tradingview pinescript repainting, lookahead bias

Yes — one of my most common requests. AI code often compiles but behaves incorrectly: silent logic errors, repainting, false confidence. I debug it, correct the logic, and harden it for live use.

If the fixes are within the selected package scope, yes. For larger architectural problems, I'll explain the recommended solution before making major changes.

Yes. Confidentiality is respected, and I can review proprietary code under NDA if required.

Examples include: Repainting, Lookahead bias, Incorrect MTF implementation, Alert timing problems, Logic contradictions, Inefficient code, Unrealistic backtest assumptions, Risk management flaws

No. My role is to validate the correctness and reliability of the implementation—not to predict market performance.

That's exactly the kind of project this gig is designed for. Many issues are subtle and only become apparent through a structured review.

I verify whether historical signals change on reload, whether your request.security() and lookahead settings leak future data, and if entry signals are triggered at the correct point in time. You get a clear yes/no with proof on the chart, plus a non-repainting fix wherever the logic allows.

Yes. I upgrade v4 and v5 scripts to v6, fixing deprecated-function errors and the integer-division and boolean-logic changes that silently break older code.

Honestly, yes. You get a straight verdict on whether the edge is real or too good to be true. I'd rather lose the upsell than deliver crap you'd waste your money on. I prefer long-term collaboration. After the first strategy works, I'll help you with strategy diversification. See my progression plan